By A. Paul, Staff Reporter
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a significant diplomatic development, Ukraine has accepted a peace proposal championed by former U.S. President Donald Trump, with only “minor details” left to be resolved, according to U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll.
The plan — a multi-point framework circulated by the United States and linked to Trump’s foreign-policy agenda — is intended to bring an end to the war between Ukraine and Russia. Driscoll told American media that Ukrainian officials have “agreed to a peace deal,” though some elements remain under negotiation.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with Driscoll and senior U.S. officials in Kyiv just days after the draft plan was delivered. Following the meeting, sources say Kyiv issued a statement indicating readiness for “constructive, honest and prompt work” on the proposal. Axios+1
Key Elements of the Proposal
While the full text of the so-called “28-point” plan has not been officially published, media reviews suggest it includes elements such as territorial compromises, restrictions on Ukraine’s future military alignment, and the suspension of accession to defensive alliances.
U.S. and Ukrainian sources indicate that Ukraine agreed in principle to the framework but stressed that key concerns remain. These include the sovereignty of Ukraine, security guarantees, and long-term protections against renewed aggression. Ukrainian officials have publicly emphasized that a peace must be “just” and not tantamount to capitulation.
Why This Matters
For Ukraine, accepting a U.S.-backed peace proposal would represent a major shift from its prior posture of continued military resistance and hardline demands for full restoration of its pre-war borders. For the United States, the agreement reflects a pivot toward diplomacy and possibly a winding down of direct military assistance involvement. For Russia, acceptance by Ukraine could open the door to formal negotiations, though Russian response has so far been cautious.
Remaining Questions and Caveats
Despite the U.S. official’s statement, several matters remain unresolved:
- The exact text of the agreement and how it addresses Ukraine’s territorial integrity remain uncertain.
- European allies of Ukraine have raised objections to several aspects of the U.S. plan, calling it too lenient toward Russian demands. Reuters
- The plan still requires Russian assent to become a meaningful peace deal. Without Russia’s buy-in, it risks being symbolic rather than substantive.
- Ukraine has stressed that any deal must not undermine its future ability to defend itself.
What Happens Next
The immediate next step appears to be the ironing out of “minor details,” according to Driscoll. Ukrainian and U.S. teams are said to be working jointly on the final provisions with an “aggressive timeline” for signature. Axios+1 A signing ceremony, possibly involving the two presidents, is being discussed but no firm date has been confirmed.
The international community—particularly European NATO members—will be closely watching for how this deal evolves, how security guarantees are maintained, and how Ukraine’s sovereignty is respected.
Conclusion
The statement from Secretary Driscoll that Ukraine has accepted the Trump-backed peace proposal marks a potentially historic juncture in the war. However, the deal’s longevity and legitimacy will depend on how the remaining details are resolved, how Russia responds, and how Ukraine secures its long-term security and territorial interests.
